About two years ago, I approached the head of a local youth basketball league about the possibility of me doing a local Coaches’ Clinic for the recreational league coaches in the area. My goal was to hopefully teach the coaches something new about basketball but also to get them to teach their players a lot of the same offensive and defensive principles and philosophy that I use at the high school. This way, when the younger players reached the high school level, they would have a solid base to build upon. When I told him this, he prompted me to be more specific. At the time I really wanted to focus on man defensive principles since that seems to be one of the most glaring weaknesses in all of the players when they start high school basketball. So I told him that, and his response was both shocking and frustrating. He told me that would not be a good idea because they do not allow any team to play man defense in their league, only zone. I asked him how it was possible to play zone defense if his players did not know how to play man defense. He did not seem to understand my question, so I explained to him that any zone defense needed to apply man defensive principles because you had to guard the man in your area whether he had the ball or not. It still did not register, so I ended the conversation before I got even more frustrated.
Fast forward two years, to another conversation I had, this time with an eighth grade basketball player. I was explaining to him that it takes the basketball players that come into the high school 2 1/2 to 3 seasons before they truly understand the man defensive concepts that we are trying to teach. This player, believing that he was a great defensive player, took my statement as an insult and tried to tell me that there was no way that was possible. The team he plays for plays a lot of zone and I told him that as a result he and his teammates knew very little about man defense. His response was, “What’s so difficult about man defense? All you have to do is guard your man.” At this point, I rested my case.
Is zone defense killing our youth’s ability to learn how to play man defense? It would appear to me that very few coaches are doing their part in teaching sound man defensive concepts. Man defense is not simply guarding your man. Man defense requires each one of the five players to guard the ball and their man. This main concept is lost on much of today’s youth basketball players and the coaches that coach them. Zone defense at the youth level is an easy way to get the players to play defense, but easy can also be translated into lazy. Players are encouraged to guard their “zone” or their “area on the court”. Very little is said about getting up and guarding the ball when it is in your area or providing help when the ball is not in your area. This can also be seen at the high school level where when teams play zone, guys no longer guard the ball nor jump to spots, thereby allowing the zone to get carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey.
Good man to man defense, if done correctly should resemble a zone. There should be plenty of pressure on the ball. If you are off the ball, it should be stressed that you “jump to your spots,” but what exactly does that mean? I tell my guys to imagine that they have a string tied to the man with the ball and the man that they are guarding.and that they must be in line with that string at all times. They should also rotate over into a position on the court where they can provide early help on the ball if the defensive man guarding him gets beat off the dribble. My guys are coached to meet the dribble penetration, not wait for it to come to them. If done properly, this will allow your team to keep the ball out of the lane and also draw some charges if the ball handler does not stop his penetration. Finally, when the ball is reversed, all players must jump to their new spots on their string and the new ball defender needs to close out with active hands and active feet. By doing so, he will prevent dribble penetration, contest the shot and deflect a possible pass.
All of these principles are sound man principles but should also be applied to zone defense. Furthermore, players should be taught these principles prior to even considering playing a zone. Think about some of the great zone defenses that have been played over the years: Temple’s zone under Chaney, Syracuse’s zone under Boeheim, and finally, the amoeba zone that Tarkanian used to run at UNLV. All of those zones are active, aggressive, and based on good man to man principles. So why is it that players today have a hard time understanding man to man defense?
Simply stated, they are not being taught correctly at the lower levels because they are constantly playing a zone without a true understanding of it. As a result, today’s younger players actually believe that playing man to man defense means guarding your man. In fact, it does not; it means guarding the ball and your man. This idea alone is very zone oriented because it requires you to be more zone-like when your man does not have the ball. However, it cannot be taught by simply playing zone defense. Younger players must be taught to get into a position defensively to provide help and recover to your own man when the ball is in your area. Consequently, guarding your man is not the difficult aspect of man to man defense to understand. It is all of the “off the ball” aspects that most players have trouble with; the idea of where they should be when their man does not have the ball. These “off the ball” concepts, along with defending the ball itself, desperately need to be taught better at the youth levels. When that happens, everyone will see better defense as a whole, man or zone.